I am fixated on two dilemmas today.

The first one is personal. What role should I have, as a young theologian and one seeking ordination in Christian ministry, in talking about politics and public issues? Abuses of the Church’s voice in the political realm have made me wary. I am also worried about the barriers that can develop between pastor and congregation, or even between pastor and those outside the Church who are seeking God, when a Christian spokesperson is too political.  I do, however, feel a particular sense of calling and have a theological interest in working on developing the Church’s social and political voice. I would like to be something of a public theologian, and to disciple other Christians in their public and social witness; particularly by being actively rooted in the history of Christian thought and action throughout the globe.

How do I ensure that the Gospel remains primary, that a winsomeness that allows all who are hungry to draw near without fear or apprehension remains my primary modus operandi?

These are difficult questions.

Another dilemma confronts me. The dilemma of American politics. My assessment of the American political landscape changes regularly. The American political landscape changes regularly, for that matter. The lens of Christian love, and Christian moral conviction, presents to me several serious social and political problems that the Church which demand the Church’s voice and hands.

American partisanship makes it hard to know how to navigate the political and governmental dimension of these problems. This may be a blessing in disguise, it should prevent the Church from being wed too closely to any particular party but standing as a mediating and mutually critiquing voice.

But it does leave the voting Christian (at least yours truly) with many difficult choices.

This is my current assessment, and all due apologies and due respect to those who identify with one group or the other: The left has proven itself wholly uncreative and un-dynamic in dealing with today’s primary social problems; it can only offer spending, debt, more laws, bureaucracy, piled on top of our serious underlying problems. The right has missed its opportunity to be the voice of creativity, and instead has opted for demagoguery, ignorance of social and racial problems, obstructionism, and at its worst–blaming the 3 M’s: migrants, minorities, and Muslims for all the country’s problems.
But putting all that aside, I can only conclude that the Church must simply continue in its slow, but joyful, work of healing souls, speaking truth, standing with the oppressed. In short, of offering Christ. In Christ is a creative and healing dynamic that all politics will always fail to match. This is not a-political, but meta-political. It is the constant return to the division between the Kingdom of God and the Kingdom of Man. 
Offering Christ. I think that this is the answer to both of these dilemmas. It gives me a framework, anyhow, even if it does not give an explicit answer for each situation that presents itself.
To add another idiosyncrasy–this is the reason I am Evangelical. American Evangelicalism has sometimes been marked by either dangerous abandonment of the social and political (I think of Billy Graham’s unwillingness to speak about segregation, an unwillingness he later regretted and repented of) or of a deep politicization that can dangerously confuse faith and patriotism, even something like nationalism (both of America, and of Israel…). But I love Evangelicalism because it tends to focus on people; everyday souls and bodies. And most of it all, because it is a movement of constantly returning the Church to the ‘main thing,’ love of God and love of neighbor, returning to Christ. And we are far from lacking a serious social witness. We boast William Wilberforce the abolitionist, Chuck Colson the prison reformer and advocate of restorative justice, The Salvation Army, World Vision, etc.
This constant return to the ‘kernel’ of Christianity, which marks Evangelicalism, has its dangers. There is the danger of a Christianity shamefully stripped of any sense of tradition (any tradition) and a watery and theologically flat relativism. The other danger is fundamentalism, a desire to grasp tightly to a breadth of ultimately periphery matters (interpretations of Genesis, eschatology) as part of ‘the kernel.’  But Evangelicalism has built in its DNA to always be checking the Church against these extremes, and returning to Christ and Church and loving others.
This is what an Evangelical political witness can be: A simplicity that preserves against over-politicization, but a simplicity grounded in the fundamental necessity of loving God and neighbor, giving birth to a conviction about speaking on behalf of the love of God in public. Both the Evangelical right and left have reflected, and sullied, these possibilities.
The best guide in such tensions is to keep the dilemma intact. This is not an Evangelical distinctive, but a clear Christian value–perhaps best articulated in Augustine’s Civitas Dei imagery. This is the constant and necessary tension of navigating between the City of God and the City of Man. This constant struggle is a necessary one.

One thought on “Dilemma

  1. My dad’s a pastor and this is how he handles politics in pastoring practice: he prays for our elected officials every service that he preaches. Democrat and Republican. Federal, state, and local. Sometimes one or two people in the congregation will be offended after a political shakeup when an opposing side is elected into office (“really? you’re praying for Obama??”), but most people really appreciate it. He also never broadcasts who he’s voting for (though I know he does have his opinions–having lived in his house for 18 years and knowing him for 24) because he doesn’t want to put distance between members of the congregation who are affiliated in other political camps. Being accessible and serving his congregation is more important to him, so he sacrifices sharing his viewpoints on issues a lot of the time. And that’s fine with him, as long as his congregation is closer to God. I admire that about him.

    I also admire that my father resists being ideologically driven. In his mind, if you teach, counsel, and prepare people to practice the fruits of the Spirit, helping them let God lead and convict them, things like standing with the oppressed flow naturally from that. So let that be your stronghold: the tiny workings in each heart, day-by-day, to be kinder and more Christ-like. The rest comes naturally.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s